Don't make Afghanistan a  victim yet again
Omar Zakhilwal, Ph.D.

(The article was published in the Arguments and Observation Section of  Sept 19, 2001  issue of the Ottawa Citizen.)

It was 1979. The Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan. It provided a golden opportunity for the United States to take its revenge on the Soviets by humiliating Russians in Afghanistan just as the Americans were in Vietnam. The US therefore resolved to fight the Soviets to the last Afghan.

Knowing this urge of the Americans and realising that Pakistan was the only country through which the US could get arms to the Afghan resistance (called, the Mujahidden), the Pakistani authority must have praised the Lord for their strategic location. Pakistan, therefore, came forward and conveyed to the US and its allies that it would serve as a conduit for the US' military assistance to the Mujahideen under the conditions that they were given the right price for their services; and that they were the ones who could choose who among the Afghan resistance could get the Western arms.    

Then for the US the end was more important than the mean. As long as the weapon was delivered to some individuals who were willing to fight the Russians why bother asking who they were; whether they were sane or insane, extremists or moderate. Unfortunately, this was the approach adopted by the United States.

Long before the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan Pakistan was already training anti-Afghanistan Islamic zealots in its Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) camps and was already involved in covert anti-state activities inside Afghanistan. After the Soviets invasion of Afghanistan Pakistan made billion of dollars by selling their trained bandits to the Western world. The Western world and particularly the United States did not hesitate in imposing those bandits on the Afghans as their leaders either. As if the Pakistani trained zealots were not enough the CIA went further and recruited proven Arab extremists such as Osama bin Laden and brought then to Afghanistan to fight against the Soviets.        

To make sure that Afghan resistance was fully under its control, Pakistan divided the Mujahideen into seven groups, putting enough differences between them so that each one was more willing to cut the throat of its rivals than that of the Soviets or its puppet communist regime in Kabul. As a result infighting between the Mujahideen was a common phenomena inside Afghanistan just as were their attacks on the Soviets. The CIA imported Arab extremists, however, operated independently and therefore were more organised and focused.

The Soviet troops stayed in Afghanistan till 1989 and its puppet communist regime survived for a few years after. In April 1992 the Afghan resistance groups finally broke it into Kabul, the capital Afghanistan and toppled Najeebullah, the then communist president of Afghanistan. The Soviet Union was now long gone and thus the US had no more strategic use for Afghans. It therefore abandoned Afghans altogether. 

Pakistan was now the sole master of the Afghans' fate. It gathered all its trained Afghan Mujahideen "leaders" in Pakistan and through an obscure formula imposed upon them a government for Kabul. However, in the background Pakistan was already tapping on the shoulders of the two rival Mujahideen groups of Ahmad Shah Masood and Gulbadeen Hekmatyar for a show down for power in Kabul. So even before the Pakistani made government of Afghanistan took over,  infighting erupted on the streets of Kabul.

Within a few months of infighting Kabul was literally levelled to ground; some fifty thousand innocent civilians lost their lives on the top of 1.5 million lives already lost to the Soviets' invasion. Kabul, this once civilised and highly cosmopolitan Asian capital became a cultural wasteland.  Kabul's destruction led an analyst to compare it to post-Hitler Berlin in which the Afghan state was divided into several war zones controlled by different warlords. The government in Kabul was barely in contact with the warlords, much less able to exercise any political or economic control. The already fragile Afghan economy literally collapsed.

The lack of legitimate sources of income forced many families to grow poppy or join criminal gangs in order to survive. The already enormous trade in smuggled goods was expanded even further and so was the trade in narcotics as each warlord including the government established contacts with international crime organizations exporting heroin and hashish to the West. Afghanistan's entire economy in effect was criminalized.  

It was only after it become the world largest producer and supplier of illicit drugs did Afghanistan got the West's attention again. By now the huge oil reserves in the Central Asian states of Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan were also discovered and Afghanistan seemed the only economical and sensible route through which that oil can be pumped to the West. There therefore was a need for an end to the infighting in Afghanistan. Pakistan now the master of all activities in Afghanistan could do that and again for the right price. As a result they got stakes in the US sponsored multi-billion oil pipeline from central Asia through Afghanistan and perhaps some other economic help. Pakistan in return unleashed on Afghanistan its trained "Taliban" - students from Religious schools.

The helpless Afghan nation, fed up with the excesses committed against them by the Mujahideen warlords, were now ready to welcome anyone including the Devil who could put an end to the Mujahideen. Thus in no time the Taliban were in control of most of Afghanistan. As soon as the Taliban took over Kabul in September 1996, Pakistan, followed by Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirate (close allies of Pakistan) wasted no time to recognize them as the legitimate government of Afghanistan. Till today these remain the only countries in the world that recognize the Taliban regime.

Taliban now owed it to Pakistan to obey as they were commanded. They did not object to Pakistan's shifting its ISI supported Kashmiri and Arab militant training camps to inside Afghanistan and they seemed perfectly okay with extracting the Pakistani favoured Kashmiri terrorists' demands in the December 1999 hijacking of an Indian plane. Over time, though, the Taliban themselves directly got involved with the militant groups and now with a sigh of satisfaction Pakistan could sit back and watch its game paying off.

Last week on September 11th the whole world watched with utmost horror and disbelief the most heinous acts of terror, devastation and death to the innocent civilians of the United States of America. Every human being no matter how insensitive he or she may be was no doubt one way or another affected by those events. No one, however, understand the evil of terror as much as the Afghans do for we understand what it feels like to be innocent victims. The Afghan nation has been a hostage to the very groups of insane individuals who are suspected for the last week's heinous crime. It has been terrorized and destroyed by them perpetually.

Also, no one understands as much as we the Afghans do the need for the world's resolve to retaliate with great force against the perpetrators, their network, their sympathizers and their harbouring states for this horrendously barbaric attack on the US soil. However, after reading numerous new articles that Pakistan, the very creator of the Taliban and the mess in Afghanistan is now "an ally" , "a partner" and "a good friend" against terrorism and once again for a right price,  one starts to wonder how successful the new resolve could be.

As for the Afghan connection to the September 11th tragedies is concerned there is none, except that the Afghan nation has been at the receiving end of similar acts of terror by the same insane imposed criminals on daily basis as the Americans were on September 11th. Isn't it time and doesn't the free world owes it to the Afghans, so instrumental in putting an end to the cold war by bringing down the communist empire, to finally pay its dues by liberating the Afghans from the selfish dangerous games played repeatedly on them by the successive Pakistani authorities rather then obliterating them for being victims of the exact same acts?

Omar Zakhilwal teaches Economics at Carleton University and is a member of the Managing Board of The Institute For Afghan Studies


The views expressed in the contributed papers are that of the writer (s) and are not necessarily shared by the Institute for Afghan  Studies (IAS). In addition the IAS can take no responsibility for the quality and content of contributed material and external links.  Please review our Privacy Statement.
www.institute-for-afghan-studies.org
To contact us, send us an email at: info@institute-for-afghan-studies.org
Copyright Protected 2001