The Conqueror of Baghdad in Bagram

By:     Dr. G. Rauf Roashan 

Abstract: A US general and a US diplomat visited Afghanistan on Friday. The military-cum-diplomatic visit was to reassure the US military and the allied forces in Afghanistan as well as Afghanistan's transitional government of the continued interest of the United States. But to the common man in the fields of Afghanistan, such visits remain only in diplomatic domain unless he sees the results of the cooperation in the form of universal security in the country, starting, in earnest, of the process of reconstruction and practical input in boosting local efforts in all spheres of production especially agriculture and above all empowerment of a strong central government with democratic provincial freedoms. Only then there would be an assurance that the US forces would be truly called forces of liberation and not those of occupation.

This is Bagram near Kabul, Afghanistan. It is Friday, April ll, 2003. General Tommy Franks is in town. He is oblivious of the many conversations that go on in the local teahouses (Samavars) like the following:

Sipping his cup of green tea, Ajab* says: " The American general is in Baghdad." "No," responds Rajab, " he is here in our own Bagram." Ajab says, "But he should be in Baghdad!" " He is here in Afghanistan," Rajab assures him. "He can be anywhere he wants. They say he says he can fight many wars at the same time. He fought and is fighting the war here while he fought another in Iraq." " He toppled Saddam's regime," Rajab continued. "He says he has liberated the Iraqis." Refilling his cup of tea, Ajab innocently asks: "Why?" Rajab, the wise guy, tells him that there are many things in world politics that Ajab does not know. Politics, he says is a dirty game. Rajab agrees by nodding. Then he continues to think of the affairs of his devastated vineyard, destroyed during the war and damaged during the five years of drought. He thinks about a lot of work that is required to revive it, a lot of replanting, nurturing, and watering and use of fertilizers and insecticides. He would need help with all of the above. In his country, Afghanistan, reconstruction has not begun in earnest. There is little that is done regarding agriculture the foundation of the country's economy. Foreign troops continue to stay here, but security has not been maintained. People tell him about incidents of fighting and attack on US troops and United Nations forces and even aid workers. At this he forces himself to forget all about Tommy Franks and his troops in this central Hindukush valley, deep in the heart of Afghanistan. He also forgets, temporarily, about Baghdad and about its ruler people said was a great tyrant, crueler than Mulla Omar.

But he cannot escape from Rajab, the wise guy's explanations about many things that have happened in his country and beyond. For example Rajab had told him, Americans are in Iraq in the same way as they were and are here in Afghanistan. In both these countries cruel regimes were in power; and both these nations needed to be liberated. American forces call themselves liberators. Some people call them forces of occupation. It is all political and beyond comprehension of many of the simple peasants. But Ajab knew the difference. Somehow, he told himself, everyone knows that. It is the duration of the stay of the foreign forces, the so-called liberators, and their attitude that make the distinction.

While the conversation continued in the teahouse, general Tommy Franks was assuring his troops in American base in Bagram that they are not forgotten or overshadowed by the events in Iraq. He was telling them that while Iraqi regime had fallen, the war against terrorism, Taleban and Al-Qaeda continues.

According to reports from Afghanistan, General Tommy Franks told soldiers belonging to some 23 countries in Bagram that they were part of the largest coalition ever built. He stressed the fact that the United States was committed to continue its fight against terrorism.

Dr. Khalilzad, the special envoy of President Bush accompanied the general. Zalmay Khalilzad also brought a message of reassurance to Afghan President Hamid Karzai.

"We will not turn our face from Afghanistan," Khalilzad said in the capital, Kabul. "We will remain committed to the reconstruction and stability in Afghanistan."

Khalilzad who is also entrusted with the task of helping in the establishment of a post-Saddam administration in Iraq, said that Afghanistan's multiethnic administration could serve as an example for a new regime in Iraq.

Many observers draw parallels between Iraq and Afghanistan. However, there are very few who point out the differences, which are wide and striking. On the other hand, many caution the United States against behavior that might lead either nation to consider its forces as forces of occupation rather than those of liberation. In Afghanistan, it is reported that already elements of Taleban and Al-Qaeda in collusion with Hizb-e-Islami are regrouping. Their objectives include disturbing the government of Mr. Karzai and expressing opposition to the existence of the 8,500 US troops in Afghanistan. There are also questions raised about the inability of the US-cum-Afghan forces so far to catch Osama, or Mulla Omar. Others pose the question of how long would the US troops stay in Afghanistan? Still there are some who believe that the United Nations forces with wider terms of reference should help the transitional government more seriously in the process of disarming of the warlords. Some believe that the United States must stop its support of the warlords in favor of a strong central government that is headed during its transitional phase by Mr. Karzai. Others see, in Mr.Karzai's frantic efforts to assert himself as the authority in the country. His most recent directives targeting provincial officials who do not actively support the government in its fight against terrorism is considered yet another of his hallow threats.

Other political observers see, in the recent visit by the American general as well as the Afghan born special envoy of President Bush, the United States continued interest in the affairs of Afghanistan. But they would all want to see the United States engaged more seriously in the process of reconstruction, and helping of the Afghans to eliminate warlordism in their country. This would also boost the ability of the US and the Afghan government to more effectively fight terrorism. 04/12/03

* Ajab and Rajab are Afghan cartoon characters.